MI: Bohacek-authored sex offender bill passes house

[thenewsdispatch.com]

INDIANAPOLIS — Senate Bill 12, authored by State Sen. Mike Bohacek, R-Michiana Shores, recently passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 91-0.

SB 12 would make it unlawful for a sex offender to intentionally establish residence within one mile of their victim. According to a press release from Bohacek’s office, this law currently only applies to sex offenders whose victims are minors. SB 12 would extend the protection to all victims regardless of age.

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“This is a major problem that needs to be addressed, and I think this bill would help victims feel more secure in their own homes.”

And I would feel more secure and safer if my.. PERSONAL INFO AND PICTURE WASN’T PLASTERED ALL OVER THE INTERNET FOR STRANGERS TO SEE.

The irony is, no lawmaker wants to address THIS major problem.

A few thoughts about this:

1. What ever happened to being able to work and live wherever you want after your sentence was served?

2. How many RCs commit another sex offense against the same victim after release from prison? I’m sure it may have happened at some point, but often enough to warrant such a law?

2a. I remember Derek Logue’s appearance on Ashleigh Banfield’s show talking about an RC who has to move in with a relative because he had nowhere else to go – that or be homeless. Was next door to his victim. Curious how that went.

3. What’s stopping the victim from moving if they don’t feel safe? Surely they have more housing options than RCs.

4. What makes forcing residence a mile away safer? How did that particular distance come to mind?

5. In general, how does the constant coddling of victimhood help victims recover?

O.K. with this latest slew of articles like this one, if you wanted to make me depressed, you did it. Too much. Good night.

So this further exacerbates issues when a relative commits a crime and is released home, narrowing the number of housing options.

Also for non related instances, how would you know where the victim lives if they have moved or if never knew where they lived? Is there going to be a victim registry so that potential housing can be queried to see if it’s within 1 mile? What happens when a victim moves into the 1 mile zone of a RC? And knowingly does it to manipulate with lives ?

There was a sensationalized story here in Michigan a few months back about a woman’s uncle who molested her and was released to live next door. I’m trying to remember if it was the same story that said she sat him at a stop light and felt traumatized all over again, wondering how long until that gets applied as well.

Come on! I mean really, are any of you really surprised by this latest attempt at finding a problem to a solution by a lonely, frustrated, because he gets no press and needing his 15 minutes of fame, legislator? Sen Bohacek is obviously hurting for some T.V. radio, blog, newspaper, water cooler/break room at the office, barber shop, Star Bucks, grocery store and where ever else he can get it, ATTENTION! Stupid legislation targeting RCs has been fashionable for over a decade so again, this bill by Sen Bohacek should be of no surprise to anyone. If you take a close look you will find that this type of thing goes on all over the Country all the time. In every state there is some dumb-ass legislator that dreams up some dumb-ass law he wants to promote so as to look like superman to suburban house wives that are in a perpetual state of fear for their children from “Frankenstein the sex offender” hanging out of a tree at a school, butt naked, hairy, with blood shot eyes, long razor sharp teeth and claws, slobbering at the mouth, breathing hard and waiting to punch on 200-300 children—at the same time. Wow!

Another residency restriction ripe for a judgment of being unconstitutional and/or punitive. What part of Smith’s “free to move where they wish and to live and work as other citizens” is unclear?

another so called lame law, wanna be politician ! no sex offender strives to live next door to thier victim. !!!